.
The unnamed patient known as Patient B and who was described as being of “non-child bearing age” also had her fallopian tube removed during the bungled op; her appendix was left untouched.
.
The incident in March 2015 occurred during a series of bungled operations carried out by Haruna which were so poorly executed, colleagues described them as “never events”.
.
One man known as Patient A who had acute appendicitis had been on a list for emergency surgery yet Haruna removed a pad of fat instead and he had to undergo a further operation a month later.
.
When health bosses began investigating, Haruna botched a third operation on a woman known as patient C who had been admitted with a cyst – only for him to remove a skin tag instead.
.
Haruna who claims to have 25 years experience later dismissed the incidents as ”trifling errors” and said the appendix and fallopian tubes were similar “worm-like structures which lie in a similar area.”
.
But at the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service a disciplinary panel found him guilty of misconduct and banned him from treating patients. .
Haruna, who represented himself, told the Manchester hearing he had “poor vision” at the time he carried out the surgery and claimed it would be “harsh” to strike him off.
.
What a wawuu!!!😞🙀🙀
Email: healththenmore@gmail.com
.
Comments
Post a Comment